This is how you end a 96-yard drive!

Here is the recommended clip that say it :
https://youtu.be/Etpd87Kw9Ig

@ronza 3 that clip is of bread in some foreign language

im shaking as a titan fan

They don’t know how the draft would go and their not that smart, as long as they knew the fanbase would like a win

That’s the reason why I am always for tanking. Idc about the 💩 players on the team allowing for us to have the option for tanking. 🙄 Fans look at the present and (short-term) future. Only the FO and entrenched, non-hot seat coaches look towards the future. The Jets with Trevor rn would have already made the playoffs this season. Probably even last season.

but they have a guy that lost his job to old joe flacco, mike white and chris streveler

well they could have had fields

Yalla are pathetic bitching about a draft pic cause your qb hasnt done good this year…. Jags were one of the worst teams last year with trevor. stop complaining that your back ups cant throw the ball

He’s rushing not receiving

I do not care who you’re a fan of.

@Poop While I do agree that people sharing their team is dumb, it is actually valid here. He’s saying that even though he’s a fan of a division rival team, he still wants us to win

Lets Be Honest We All Remember This Video:-
https://youtu.be/q4dM7tie-U8

I’m assuming you mean their uniforms, because that team is a mess right now.

@Shane McDaniel I prob should have Clarifying that but yes is bad as they are in this game they look good doing it in those all black unis

He is literally a ball carrier as soon as he snaps the ball. he wouldn’t/shouldn’t have to demonstrate “control” through the ground like a wr. Common sense

im not sure if this is trolling or not but he literally starts the play with the ball in his hands lil bro

Yes, correct.

yeah, that’s how football works. Otherwise everything would be a catch.

Yes because he already had established possession of the ball in the field of play and then he crossed the goal line.

A receiver who catches the ball in the end zone doesn’t have possession of the ball in the field of play until he catches the ball.

It’s not hard to understand.

How is this related at all lol

@Jimbo 03 Saltiness does not require relation

With how officiating has been this past week I wouldn’t be surprised if they kept that play alive.

@William Xiong I’m shocked they didn’t go to replay and call it a touchback, Jets ball.

Those are the rules, Always has been

Not at all. The rule has always been, once the runner crosses the ball over the endzone with control, the play instantly dies and it’s a touchdown

Run plays are different by rule. The ground can’t cause a fumble, but the ground can cause an incomplete pass (not maintaining possession). If you already are considered a runner with the ball, the moment the ball crosses the goal line while being possessed by a player means the play instantly dies and it’s a touchdown. Pass plays are different due to the fact that you need to consider the catching rules to ensure someone maintains possession and fully catches a ball before you say it’s a touchdown, even if they’re in the middle of the end zone. Rule has always been that way, makes perfect sense that way, and I don’t see where the problem is.

@bobinowsk Maybe, but this has been how it’s worked since the beginning of the game. Can’t really just change it up now.

@bobinowsk Run plays are different by rule. The ground can’t cause a fumble, but the ground can cause an incomplete pass (not maintaining possession). If you already are considered a runner with the ball, the moment the ball crosses the goal line while being possessed by a player means the play instantly dies and it’s a touchdown. Pass plays are different due to the fact that you need to consider the catching rules to ensure someone maintains possession and fully catches a ball before you say it’s a touchdown, even if they’re in the middle of the end zone. Rule has always been that way, makes perfect sense that way.

Runner and receiver are two different “states” that need to be distinguished. This is just how the rules distinguish them, and the advantage of each. Catching rules are catching rules only, not “catching rules in end zone.” Until you officially “catch” a ball and maintain possession, you are still a receiver, not a runner. And since it is only a “runner” who has possession of the ball, it is the only way to truly score. There is no differences in the rules, it’s the same it’s always universally been for everything. Sorry if I overexplained things, but I hope I explained it well at least.

@Xeractyll thank you for your effort, truly! There’s a lot of the rule book I probably still haven’t come across.

I’m not saying the rule should be eradicated, just….made better somehow, or fairer to the defense? It’s just an uneasy feeling I get when watching the game that it’s a weak rule or a very cheap TD, you know? The team may have driven 96 years downfield only to have a TD by 1mm of the ball crossing the line. You couldn’t get that yard or so (or less sometimes) with 3 attempts because the defense did such a great job, only for the RB or QB on 4th down to leap over the O-line from 3 yards out and 1mm of the ball cross the invisible goal line for a TD. The defense just stares on knowing there’s not much they can do to stop a leaping player…even if they do cause a fumble post TD. Just seems a way bigger advantage for an offense compared to the defense who can rarely do anything about it. Just my opinion. Perhaps the simple answer is that ALL the ball should cross the line? Makes it fairer for the defense, right? Not sure how my argument compares to a QB sneak either. Someone may rip my argument apart on that one.

I understand the rule has always been there or at least for a long time. It’s my favourite sport by a long mile for all the years I’ve watched, but I’ve never taken to that rule.

@Pop Culture Jaguar I think they could as they change rules every year regarding safety. Small rule change like the ENTIRE ball has to cross the line makes it fairer for the defense I think.